eng deu рус

Network of survival of humanity:

We are concerned about the threat of the destruction of humanity as a result of social polarization when using artificial intelligence to manipulate people.
Polarization was always there, but people were opposed by people not armed with a psycho machines.
Surprisingly, this - the most important issue - is hardly discussed!
The terrible is not “Manipulated democracy”, but the fact that it can lead to the death of mankind. But people do not see it.

Public attention and a network that would deal with this problem are needed.
If you agree with this, then could you express your opinion - what to do ?
Can you advise, for example, a social network that would:
1. It would not require any information about myself during registration , for example, for advertising.
2. It would decentralized for unsinkability and unknown numbers of participants.
3. It would allow, it is desirable, arbitrary structuring according to the opinions of participants.
4. It would not use, it is desirable, anonymizer , since their use is prohibited.

We are a supporter of non-violence and intend to act 100% openly and within the framework of the law, but I am afraid to create an organization through social networks such as «VKontakte», since the issues affect the existing manipulation and polarization.
We do not want to complicate the lives of participants living in authoritarian countries by divulging their personal data.

Reckon on not to hide, but to:
1. The calm of the participants.
2. Lack of legal surveillance and evidence that Joe is Ivan. Those who hunt down will already be criminals.
3. The cost of tracking P2P-networks.
4. The use of anonymizers - under personal responsibility.
Normative decentralization is the absence of not only management, but also common rules and collective responsibility:
4.1. The cooperation of the participants is limited to the issues of survival of Civilization.
4.2. Independent arbitrary structuring, grouping of participants.

Statements, for example, are not prosecuted in social networks , even «extremist»,
But there is a criterion in the s-service manual - Creating an organization using social networks?
S-services are only interested by «destabilizing» actions and «here and now»?
Where are there more tips on personal safety , statistics of «violations» - repressions?

For example, participants can develop recommendations for themselves on:
1. Activities under the law.
2. The increase in the costs of hunt down and interference.

How to connect like-minded people on the topic ?:

By «network marketing» mailing via e-mail it is not possible to gather like-minded people.
We will try to compromise:
1. I still use Facebook, but not for correspondence, but for the swapping by e-mails.
2. Openness on my part.

We would be very grateful if you show my letter and coordinates to people concerned about the same threat. Or give them anonymous coordinates to me.
Where, in what networks do you recommend looking for activists who may be not indifferent to the problem? - In centralized organizations s coordinate their activists do not give .
Or generally speak out on the problem.

Inform you about the progress of this project?
We also propose not to respond to insults - not to succumb to the provocations of «satanization».

P p Emer s my x ( Edil Edil ) Commentary s :

www.svoboda.org/a/30529054.html
www.svoboda.org/a/30538060.html
www. svoboda.org/a/30391409.html
www. svoboda.org/a/30104262.html?fb_comment_id=2313070828813653_2315361188584617